– Clip 1 Introduction – Clip 2 Course Description – Clip 3 Test Parameters – Clip 4 Test Equipment – Clip 5 Overview – Clip 6 Measurements – Clip 7 Arduino Mega setup – Clip 8 Arduino power supply – Clip 9 Pulse wave sequence – Clip 10 Driver Power LM2596S – Clip 11 First run 242 Hz – Clip 12 Chart Plot – Clip 13 242 Hz Chart – Clip 14 Calculation 1 – Clip 15 Summary 1 – Clip 16 Second run 316 Hz – Clip 17 Chart 316 Hz – Clip 18 Calculation 2 – Clip 19 Second summary – Clip 20 Third run 473 Hz – Clip 21 Chart 473 Hz – Clip 22 Calculation 3 – Clip 23 Third summary – Clip 24 End of part 4

Link to the Arduino Sketches

lClip 1

Clip 1

As announced I will test in this video series the Arduino Mega 2560 as signal generator. I will go into the details of the setup and the benefits to use this inexpensive controller board. We will do the charging performance of the battery and compare to the standard 60 Watt charger.

Clip 2

Clip2

Part 4
Solid State Battery charging
Arduino Mega 2560, 8 Port signal provision

– Analyse the charging characteristic of the isolation transformer via the Arduino Mega 2560 controller
– Change ratios of both frequencies and delay to various values and investigate the coil feedback
– Test three frequencies and the battery charging performance

Clip 3

Clip 3

Test Parameters

1. Voltage source is a Bench Top Power Supply
2. Charging one battery with 12 Volt and 8 AH
3. Two four Amplifier Modules with IRFP450 MOSFET
4, 10 coil/windings Isolation transformer
5. Arduino Mega 2560
6. LM2596S DC-DC step down voltage regulator, 3 A

Clip 4

Clip 4

Test Equipment Part 4

Tools

– EA, PS 2000 B, 84 V 5 A, Power supply
– Keithley 2110 Bench Digital Multimeter 5.5
– Agilent InfiniVision 3000 Series oscilloscope DSO3014A
– Agilent U1242B, U1231A, U1332A
– Agilent U1117A IR-Bluetooth adapter
– HP Laptop

Clip 5

Clip 5

We have discussed in the last video that two frequencies are capable to break the resistance barrier of the back EMF and allow us to drive more current. We will use now the Arduino Mega 2560 where we use 8 ports to drive 8 coils individual. The frequency will be the same for all of them but they are triggered one after the other in the same frequency, also called delayed. I use a new power supply which has intelligence built in to allow me to drive voltage and current individual. It gives me the opportunity to remote control, monitor and apply threshold for an automatic shutdown which keeps the DUT (Device Under Test) safe.

Clip 6

Clip 6

I like to show what kind of monitoring we will perform. Here you see in the first picture the discharge curve of the battery. We use this charging to monitor the charging via the Keithley DMM later on. We then have the Agilent DMMs we monitor and further the monitor screen of the Power supply. Her I can log and monitor as well as under sequence function drive a power pattern to the DUT and log the feedback via all DMM’s. it also has charting function for the set values and the Is values of Voltage and Current.

Clip 7

Clip 7

 Here you see the Arduino Mega and on top the so called Shield. It is the option to connect to the board and further provide and capture signals. I have built a breakout box for the 8 ports and secure each port with a resistance to keep the 40mA draw per port below that. Capacitors connect to each port and shunt ground eliminates small spikes on the signal.

Clip 8

Clip 8

 I like to make one point. When driving any additional electronic from the 5 Volt output of the arduino board you will not get the 5 Volt based on the current requirement. In my case I am below 4 volt and we need to increase this to 5 Volt. I have a 9 Volt battery which is connected to the vin port and supplies a higher voltage which is regulated by the board down to 5 volt by is also providing more current that the LM2596S voltage regulator can see the 5 Volt via the load. I have the option to change the voltage  level and can safely restrict it to avoid dames on the components.

Clip 9

Clip 9

 On the oscilloscope you see now 4 of the 8 port signals. Each signal is triggered after the other and between the signal you see the delay. We have to give the back EMF time to propagate and trigger afterwards the signal. Decreasing delay will increase the frequency. You have to go forward and backward with the setting on the arduino board to get it right.

Clip 10

Clip 10

 I like to point your attention on the current requirement for your drivers. teh 9 Volt battery I used before is not able to provide the current for the drivers. I use a small 12 Volt battery here with 3.3AH which has plenty of power to provide for that. The voltage regulator again does help to keep the voltage at the level rage we need.

Clip 11

Clip 11

 We start now our first test with 242 Hz. And disconnect the load from the battery to start charging. You see on the oscilloscope the values for the spike voltage around 120 Volt and the reactive voltage around 30 Volt. The white spikes are the power values and come in clear to see packages which indicate the individual ports back EMF. The 8th port is not visible and might be within the rest of the 7. First guess, but will require more analysis. The charging time is fast and I will provide the details on the board.

Clip 12

Clip 12

 The real time chart gives you a steady curve to the higher voltage level. We see not flat lining close to the 13.5 volt and reach the target voltage in a very short time.

Clip 13

Clip 13

 The chart analysis did provide the target voltage in 10 Minutes and 40 Seconds. This does break theoretical the performance of the standard battery charger.

Clip 14

Clip 14

 We integrate our measurements into the formula

V = 13 Volt Power Supply Driver V = 5 Volt
I = 1.08 A
P= V * I = 13 Volt * 1.08 A = 14.04 Watt

Frequency 242 Hz, Pulse width 10%
From 12 V to 13.5 V in 10 Minutes and 40 Seconds

Power requirement = 14.04 Watt * 0.1730 h = 0.0024 KWh

From a 60 Watt battery charger, charged to 13.5 Volt in 39 Minutes and 12 Seconds
Power consumption is 39.12 Watt or 0.03912 KWh

The charge power performance is 1603 % compared to the standard
charger or COP of 16.03 and from a charging rate time of view 376% increasing
the overall COP to around COP =60.27 or 6027 %

Clip 15

Clip 15

 First Summary

The use of the Arduino Mega 2560 controller circuit was proven to be the key to
unlock the true potential of the isolation transformer. Not only does we not need
to use an average calculations to reach the practical 13.5 Volt from 12 Volt. We
also charge in half the time compared to the discharge of the battery with a 60
Watt light bulb. This result is the fundament for a self-running energy device.
There are still some anomalous readings, like the jitter at the higher charging
voltage, causing it to a greater deal during the charge cycle to go up and down
in voltage. The spikes are not all at the same output level. All coils are linked and
every back EMF is also on all the other coils, causing a feedback which is creating
a pattern on all the following spikes to jump up and down. We saw in the previous
video frequency test and I promised you will see the same behaviour on the
Arduino board. We move on to use a higher frequency and measure the performance.

Clip 16

Clip 16

We start now our second test with a higher frequency of 316 Hz.  The charging performance increases 4 fold and the current increases by 50%

Clip 17

Clip 17

The  chart does show that we reach the 13.5 Volt in 3 minutes and 20 Seconds. That is a great value.

Clip 18

Clip 18

We integrate our measurements into the formula

V = 13 Volt Power Supply Driver V = 5 Volt
I = 1.54 A
P= V * I = 13 Volt * 1.54 A = 20.02 Watt

Frequency 316 Hz, Pulse width 10%
From 12 V to 13.5 V in 3 Minutes and 20 Seconds

Power requirement = 20.02 Watt * 0.0530 h = 0.0011 KWh

From a 60 Watt battery charger, charged to 13.5 Volt in 39 Minutes and 12 Seconds
Power consumption is 39.12 Watt or 0.03912 KWh

The charge power performance is 3556 % compared to the standard
charger or COP of 35.56 and from a charging rate time of view 1225% increasing
the overall COP to around COP = 435.61 or 43561 %

Clip 19

Clip 19

Second Summary

The increased frequency has effects not anticipated. First it doesn’t decrease
the power consumption. Second, it increases the charging power impact 4 fold
for 50% more current required. Opposite of standard calculations, where
increased frequency leads to decreased power consumption for the same
voltage. The only option is to increase the voltage, which is not required here at
all. We achieve a three digit COP and we have not even started yet. Note that the
chemical imbalance is achieved by tapping into the ZPE field. The conventional
method to charge is brute force and very inefficient. The factor to achieve
performance is a measure of many impulses per cycle. Tesla said: the higher the
frequency the higher the power output. Here it all makes sense and is proven
experimental and scientifically measured to be correct. Also note that we have
only addressed one of many deficiencies and that the Bedini circuit does not yield
any of these results. Let us move to the next higher frequency and compare the results.

Clip 20

Clip 20

We conduct now our last test with 473 Hz.  We draw initial 100 mA more current which then drops and see at 13.324 volt an erratic fluctuation of current.

Clip 22

Clip 22

We integrate our measurements into the formula

V = 13 Volt Power Supply Driver V = 5 Volt
I = 1.64 A
P= V * I = 13 Volt * 1.64 A = 21.32 Watt

Frequency 473 Hz, Pulse width 10%
From 12 V to 13.5 V in 3 Minutes and 35 Seconds

Power requirement = 21.32 Watt * 0.0558 h = 0.0012 KWh

From a 60 Watt battery charger, charged to 13.5 Volt in 39 Minutes and 12 Seconds
Power consumption is 39.12 Watt or 0.03912 KWh

The charge power performance is 3260% compared to the standard
charger or COP of 32.6 and from a charging rate time of view 1168% increasing
the overall COP to around COP = 380.77 or 38077 %

Clip 23

Clip 23

Third Summary

In our third test we had initially an increase of current of about 100 mA which
was used steady to a charging level of 13.324 Volt at which point the battery
voltage became erratic with jitters. Based on that, the overall performance is
lower than at 316 Hz. Many more tests need to be conducted and the circuitry
and the timing circuit optimised. I will try the higher current values and frequencies
for the multiple battery charging test. We can already conclude that his system
can run in self sustain mode. I will work on it with the additional coils not used
yet to take the energy for the control circuits and driver power.

Clip 24

Clip 24

End of Part 4
Solid State driven Battery charger
via Arduino Mega 2560

Clip 25